Hey, remember when I did these weekly? We only recently stopped weighing her weekly, but as you know, I stopped posting weekly quite some time ago. Looking back over the blog, it looks like the last time I posted stats is June 1, 2011. Is that really possible? Sheesh. I'm a bad preemie mommy blogger. But we were at the doc on Wednesday, so here are her stats as of then and total gains since she got her feeding tube and we began growth hormone shots.
June 1, 2011: 11.20 kg (24 pounds, 12 ounces), 34 inches
February 1, 2012: 11.70 kg (25 pounds, 13 ounces), 36 inches
8 Months' Change (surely it hasn't been THAT long!): 0.5 kg (1 pound, 2 ounces), 2 inches
Net Change: 5000 grams (133 ounces = 8 pounds, 5 ounces), 7.5 inches
Soooo...her weight gain hasn't been great, but a 3-year-old to growing 2 inches in 8 months isn't too shabby. Her docs aren't so concerned about her weight gain at the moment because she is picking up height, which tells us that she's getting enough nutrition. She's got the rest of her life to gain weight. Percentile-wise, her weight is back down to the < 3rd percentile range, but her height is 6th percentile! Wohoo!
Showing posts with label stats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stats. Show all posts
Sunday, February 5, 2012
Thursday, June 2, 2011
What What??
I know, two posts in two days - insanity! But I just looked at Becca's clinical record on myhealthatvanderbilt.com, and for the first time ever -- FIRST TIME EVER! -- EVER EVER!! -- she doesn't have a < symbol in front of her weight percentile. She's actually, genuinely on the growth chart, right on the 3rd percentile line! Woo-damn-hoo!
And that is all.
Oh, okay, I'll go ahead and tell you what the GI doctor said this afternoon. Most interestingly, when I told him that she qualified for the special ed program (more on that later), he laughed and said, "We'll see how long that lasts -- she's really smart!" She had, after all, just showed him where her liver and esophagus are.
But he also said that he wants a new, formal feeding evaluation and another scope to check out the inflammation in her esophagus. It's been a year since we did either of these, and he just likes to repeat them every so often, which works for me. The scope will involve withholding the second half of the nights' feeds, but he's going to make sure she's the first case in the morning so she (hopefully) won't revisit the hypoglycemic seizures we've seen in the past.
And speaking of feeding and evaluations and therapy, we discussed weaning from the g-tube. Becca's current feeding therapist is all about it - she wants to change her continuous feeds to bolus feeds (a lot at once instead of a slow drip) so that Becca gets hungrier and is more likely to eat. I'm very much opposed to this plan right now - we are simply too dependent on the tube for her basic nutrition still. I mean, it's not like she's exactly caught up in her growth and weight or anything, and we're pushing as much milk down the tube as possible in order to gain every gram possible - and it's FINALLY working. And she's ever solids better than ever. (Though still nowhere near getting most of her calories from solids.) I think this therapist doesn't fully appreciate how bad her feeding issues initially were and how far she has come in the past couple of months. My biggest goal for feeding therapy right now is for them to work on desensitizing her gag reflex so that she throws up less and keeps more food down. Seems like that would help her grow AND make eating more pleasant. I mean, throwing up every day doesn't exactly make food appetizing. I guess some parents want to start weaning as soon as the tube gets put in, but, really, I'm in no hurry to get off the tube. We got the darn thing, surgery and all, to get food into - not to immediately start treating it like the enemy we have to root out. For us, it needs to go side by side with learning to eat solids.
And the doctor agrees. He REALLY doesn't want us to work on weaning or even condensing or decreasing tube feeds AT ALL yet. For heaven's sake, today is the first time she's legitimately ON the stupid growth chart! Give the kid some time to chunk up before taking away her main source of nutrition. If she can learn to like McDonald's hamburgers (yes, it's true - she'll eat an entire patty!) while still getting tube feeds, surely the g-tube isn't disrupting her hunger and feeding patterns too much. What it is doing is giving her the nutrition she needs to grow and develop into the big, strong, SMART and FUNNY girl that she is becoming!
So there. No weaning pressure. I feel validated. We're still on the "get as many calories in her as we can" plan*. That feels better. Now eat up, little one. I'll take you to "Old McDonald's" whenever you want.
* One caveat: we really used to feed her absolutely anything she would eat because we really needed every single last calorie that we could get in her. I'm still VERY flexible with her menu, but we are being intentional about making sure that she's offered a balanced meal each time - at least one protein, fruit or veggie an starch. I'm fine with that protein being ridiculously processed hot dogs, etc, but we are steering away from meals that consist solely of chocolate chips and M&M's, because that's what responsible parents do AND because, ironically, Becca is actually at a very high risk of developing diabetes and becoming obese in adolescence and adulthood, so the healthy patterns we are (slowly) working on instilling in her will be even more important than for her peers. I'm even getting used to eating a few more real meals myself. :)
And that is all.
Oh, okay, I'll go ahead and tell you what the GI doctor said this afternoon. Most interestingly, when I told him that she qualified for the special ed program (more on that later), he laughed and said, "We'll see how long that lasts -- she's really smart!" She had, after all, just showed him where her liver and esophagus are.
But he also said that he wants a new, formal feeding evaluation and another scope to check out the inflammation in her esophagus. It's been a year since we did either of these, and he just likes to repeat them every so often, which works for me. The scope will involve withholding the second half of the nights' feeds, but he's going to make sure she's the first case in the morning so she (hopefully) won't revisit the hypoglycemic seizures we've seen in the past.
And speaking of feeding and evaluations and therapy, we discussed weaning from the g-tube. Becca's current feeding therapist is all about it - she wants to change her continuous feeds to bolus feeds (a lot at once instead of a slow drip) so that Becca gets hungrier and is more likely to eat. I'm very much opposed to this plan right now - we are simply too dependent on the tube for her basic nutrition still. I mean, it's not like she's exactly caught up in her growth and weight or anything, and we're pushing as much milk down the tube as possible in order to gain every gram possible - and it's FINALLY working. And she's ever solids better than ever. (Though still nowhere near getting most of her calories from solids.) I think this therapist doesn't fully appreciate how bad her feeding issues initially were and how far she has come in the past couple of months. My biggest goal for feeding therapy right now is for them to work on desensitizing her gag reflex so that she throws up less and keeps more food down. Seems like that would help her grow AND make eating more pleasant. I mean, throwing up every day doesn't exactly make food appetizing. I guess some parents want to start weaning as soon as the tube gets put in, but, really, I'm in no hurry to get off the tube. We got the darn thing, surgery and all, to get food into - not to immediately start treating it like the enemy we have to root out. For us, it needs to go side by side with learning to eat solids.
And the doctor agrees. He REALLY doesn't want us to work on weaning or even condensing or decreasing tube feeds AT ALL yet. For heaven's sake, today is the first time she's legitimately ON the stupid growth chart! Give the kid some time to chunk up before taking away her main source of nutrition. If she can learn to like McDonald's hamburgers (yes, it's true - she'll eat an entire patty!) while still getting tube feeds, surely the g-tube isn't disrupting her hunger and feeding patterns too much. What it is doing is giving her the nutrition she needs to grow and develop into the big, strong, SMART and FUNNY girl that she is becoming!
So there. No weaning pressure. I feel validated. We're still on the "get as many calories in her as we can" plan*. That feels better. Now eat up, little one. I'll take you to "Old McDonald's" whenever you want.
* One caveat: we really used to feed her absolutely anything she would eat because we really needed every single last calorie that we could get in her. I'm still VERY flexible with her menu, but we are being intentional about making sure that she's offered a balanced meal each time - at least one protein, fruit or veggie an starch. I'm fine with that protein being ridiculously processed hot dogs, etc, but we are steering away from meals that consist solely of chocolate chips and M&M's, because that's what responsible parents do AND because, ironically, Becca is actually at a very high risk of developing diabetes and becoming obese in adolescence and adulthood, so the healthy patterns we are (slowly) working on instilling in her will be even more important than for her peers. I'm even getting used to eating a few more real meals myself. :)
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Wednesday/Weekly/Bimothly Weigh In
Hey, do you guys remember me? My name's Nancy; I've got a little girl who used to be a really, really, really, really little girl? And she's super duper cute? Yeah, that's me. I'm still around. Just gone radio silent. For no good reason, really. Or for lots of good reasons. There's been so much exciting happening in our lives the past month or so that I keep avoiding the blog because it will take forever to actually catch you up. (No, I'm not pregnant.) But I've got to start somewhere, I guess, so let me give you your first stats update since March 19. (Craziness, I know!)
March 19: 10.05 kg (22 pounds, 3 ounces), 32.75 inches
Today: 11.20 kg (24 pounds, 12 ounces), 34 inches
11 Weeks' Change: 1.15 kg (2 pounds, 9 ounces), 1.75 inches
Net Change: 4500 grams (115 ounces = 7 pounds, 3 ounces), 5.5 inches
That looks great to me! We go to the GI doc this afternoon, so we'll see what he thinks, too. She's now gained the weight of an average-sized newborn. :)
March 19: 10.05 kg (22 pounds, 3 ounces), 32.75 inches
Today: 11.20 kg (24 pounds, 12 ounces), 34 inches
11 Weeks' Change: 1.15 kg (2 pounds, 9 ounces), 1.75 inches
Net Change: 4500 grams (115 ounces = 7 pounds, 3 ounces), 5.5 inches
That looks great to me! We go to the GI doc this afternoon, so we'll see what he thinks, too. She's now gained the weight of an average-sized newborn. :)
Saturday, March 19, 2011
"Wednesday" Weigh-In
Wednesday, Saturday, what's the difference? :)
Last week: 10.00 kg (22 pounds, 1 ounce), 32 inches
This week: 10.05 kg (22 pounds, 3 ounces), 32.75 inches
Week's change: +50 grams (2 ounces), + 0.75 inches
Net change: +2350 grams (74 ounces = 4 pounds, 12 ounces), +3.75 inches
These measurments were taken at the endocrinologist's office, so we may seem some fluctuation on the weight next week as we move back to our regular scale. And I'm quite sure that we'll see some fluctuation in the height, too, because that's how we roll, apparently. I do think that this is probably the most accurate height measurement we've had in a while. Since endocrinology follows many kids specifically for growth concerns, the nurses in that office are very well trained in taking height measurements. They've also got slightly different equipment that I think is more accurate. So, all of that is to say that Becca is indeed NOT on the growth charts yet, but she's making some great progress.
When we started growth hormone shots last summer, Becca was 3.79 standard deviations below average (a.k.a. the 50th percentile line). (If you don't know what standard deviations are, sorry, but I don't really know how to explain them. Just look at the numbers and be impressed.) After nearly 9 months of therapy, she has bumped up to 2.45 standard deviations below average. The 3rd (Or is it 5th? Crap. I think it's 3rd.) percentile line is 2.0 standard deviations below average. So she's getting much, much closer! Maybe in another few months, she'll actually be on there! She is at least no longer falling off the bottom of the paper, so that's better.
Becca is having a harder time with her daily shots, though. As hard as it is to see her upset, this is probably a good sign, because it (probably) indicates that her sensory integration therapy (OT) is kicking in and she's feeling pain more. Yes, that sounds crazy, but it's a good thing that she can sense pain. After consulting with my friend Bekah, who is a preemie mama and a Child Life Specialist at Vandy, we've started giving Becca a Band-Aid after every shot. The needle is so tiny that 90% of the time she doesn't need one, but she LOVES "bannai," so getting to pick which one she gets (right now it's Elmo or Pooh Bear) and getting to help put it on is a big deal. It not only distracts her, but it also empowers her a little. She doesn't have a choice in getting the shot, but she can choose her Band-Aid!
Last week: 10.00 kg (22 pounds, 1 ounce), 32 inches
This week: 10.05 kg (22 pounds, 3 ounces), 32.75 inches
Week's change: +50 grams (2 ounces), + 0.75 inches
Net change: +2350 grams (74 ounces = 4 pounds, 12 ounces), +3.75 inches
These measurments were taken at the endocrinologist's office, so we may seem some fluctuation on the weight next week as we move back to our regular scale. And I'm quite sure that we'll see some fluctuation in the height, too, because that's how we roll, apparently. I do think that this is probably the most accurate height measurement we've had in a while. Since endocrinology follows many kids specifically for growth concerns, the nurses in that office are very well trained in taking height measurements. They've also got slightly different equipment that I think is more accurate. So, all of that is to say that Becca is indeed NOT on the growth charts yet, but she's making some great progress.
When we started growth hormone shots last summer, Becca was 3.79 standard deviations below average (a.k.a. the 50th percentile line). (If you don't know what standard deviations are, sorry, but I don't really know how to explain them. Just look at the numbers and be impressed.) After nearly 9 months of therapy, she has bumped up to 2.45 standard deviations below average. The 3rd (Or is it 5th? Crap. I think it's 3rd.) percentile line is 2.0 standard deviations below average. So she's getting much, much closer! Maybe in another few months, she'll actually be on there! She is at least no longer falling off the bottom of the paper, so that's better.
Becca is having a harder time with her daily shots, though. As hard as it is to see her upset, this is probably a good sign, because it (probably) indicates that her sensory integration therapy (OT) is kicking in and she's feeling pain more. Yes, that sounds crazy, but it's a good thing that she can sense pain. After consulting with my friend Bekah, who is a preemie mama and a Child Life Specialist at Vandy, we've started giving Becca a Band-Aid after every shot. The needle is so tiny that 90% of the time she doesn't need one, but she LOVES "bannai," so getting to pick which one she gets (right now it's Elmo or Pooh Bear) and getting to help put it on is a big deal. It not only distracts her, but it also empowers her a little. She doesn't have a choice in getting the shot, but she can choose her Band-Aid!
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Wednesday Weigh-In
Told ya we wouldn't stay on the charts! Still, I didn't expect her to shrink TWO INCHES! You'd think measurements would be a fairly exact science. Apparently not. Her weight gain was good, though!
Last week: 9.85 kg (21 pounds, 12 ounces), 34 inches
This week: 10.00 kg (22 pounds, 1 ounce), 32 inches
Week's change: +150 grams (5 ounces), -2 inches
Net change: +2300 grams (74 ounces = 4 pounds, 10 ounces), +3 inches
We go to endocrine next week, and they are really particular about measuring her height, since they are the ones really looking at her size. Should be interesting to compare!
Monday, March 7, 2011
Off the Charts...
...is where we usually fall. But check this out:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, for the first time in her life, Itty Bitty Becca is ON THE GROWTH CHART FOR HEIGHT!* 6th percentile! Wohoo! That means that she's taller than 5% of other kids her actual age! Now - this measurement was taken at her weigh in last Wednesday, and you've heard me talk about how these measurements are not exactly scientific. This particular measurement had Becca growing an inch in a week, so it's probably a generous measurement, but, still she's been trending upward relatively sharply lately, so even if she drops off the chart this week, I expect she'll be back on it soon.
Seriously, y'all, this is crazy awesome. When I say this is the first time she's been on the chart in her life, I mean LIFE in the most pro-lifer sense you can imagine. Her very first measurements were taken at 8 weeks gestation. She was a little smaller than expected then, so they adjusted my due date to 4 days later, even though I can still tell you to the hour the day that she was conceived. (Don't worry; I won't.) So she was essentially 4 days too short then. (Normally, I wouldn't think of an ultrasound that early being behind, but since a few weeks later she was significantly behind, I think (in retrospect) we were seeing her poor growth pattern that early.) At 17 weeks, she was a full 2 weeks behind. When she was born at 28 weeks, she was 9-10 weeks behind on length (and slightly less behind on weight and even slightly-er less behind on head circumference).
And of course, since she formally became a baby, she's been off the charts. Literally. As in, if you tried to plot her height and weight (particularly height) on a standard growth chart (or on one for preemies that has the 3rd percentile line marked), there are not lines on the graph on which to put her dot. (And I don't mean the growth curve line. I'm talking about the actual grid.)
But here she is, standing tall at 34 inches and ruling the 6th percentile! Take that, IUGR! And big thanks to you, growth hormone "pokes"! Her weight is still waaaaay down there (note in the photo that it says "< 3rd percentile" - that's the lowest interpretation they put there - so it doesn't mean that she's in the 2nd percentile or anything). She's in 9-12 month clothes on weight but 2T in height, and that does make finding clothes for her challenging, but heaven knows I've managed to assemble a wardrobe with 1 or 2 things in it for her. :) But still...
Watch out, world. Becca Hill just may hit 5 feet yet!
*She's been tracking in the very low percentiles for head circumference for a while now - that's the asymmetrical part of her asymmetrical intrauterine growth restriction.
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, for the first time in her life, Itty Bitty Becca is ON THE GROWTH CHART FOR HEIGHT!* 6th percentile! Wohoo! That means that she's taller than 5% of other kids her actual age! Now - this measurement was taken at her weigh in last Wednesday, and you've heard me talk about how these measurements are not exactly scientific. This particular measurement had Becca growing an inch in a week, so it's probably a generous measurement, but, still she's been trending upward relatively sharply lately, so even if she drops off the chart this week, I expect she'll be back on it soon.
Seriously, y'all, this is crazy awesome. When I say this is the first time she's been on the chart in her life, I mean LIFE in the most pro-lifer sense you can imagine. Her very first measurements were taken at 8 weeks gestation. She was a little smaller than expected then, so they adjusted my due date to 4 days later, even though I can still tell you to the hour the day that she was conceived. (Don't worry; I won't.) So she was essentially 4 days too short then. (Normally, I wouldn't think of an ultrasound that early being behind, but since a few weeks later she was significantly behind, I think (in retrospect) we were seeing her poor growth pattern that early.) At 17 weeks, she was a full 2 weeks behind. When she was born at 28 weeks, she was 9-10 weeks behind on length (and slightly less behind on weight and even slightly-er less behind on head circumference).
And of course, since she formally became a baby, she's been off the charts. Literally. As in, if you tried to plot her height and weight (particularly height) on a standard growth chart (or on one for preemies that has the 3rd percentile line marked), there are not lines on the graph on which to put her dot. (And I don't mean the growth curve line. I'm talking about the actual grid.)
But here she is, standing tall at 34 inches and ruling the 6th percentile! Take that, IUGR! And big thanks to you, growth hormone "pokes"! Her weight is still waaaaay down there (note in the photo that it says "< 3rd percentile" - that's the lowest interpretation they put there - so it doesn't mean that she's in the 2nd percentile or anything). She's in 9-12 month clothes on weight but 2T in height, and that does make finding clothes for her challenging, but heaven knows I've managed to assemble a wardrobe with 1 or 2 things in it for her. :) But still...
Watch out, world. Becca Hill just may hit 5 feet yet!
*She's been tracking in the very low percentiles for head circumference for a while now - that's the asymmetrical part of her asymmetrical intrauterine growth restriction.
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Wednesday Weigh-In & GI Update
Last week: 9.9 kg (21 pounds, 13 ounces), 33 inches
This week: 9.85 kg (21 pounds, 12 ounces), 34 inches
Week's change: -50 grams (1 ounce), + 1 inch
Net change: +2150 grams (69 ounces = 4 pounds, 5 ounces), +5 inches
Becca was sick over the weekend with another NSVI, so the weight loss is not unexpected. (NSVI = a non-specific viral illness, which means that the docs don't know and don't need to know what it is because it's not very serious and they knowing would change the course of treatment. We've had several of these this winter. I think it's amusing that there's a technical name for it.) She's still a little puny but doing fine and no longer contagious, just a little more, um, opinionated and tired than normal.
The second half of last week and this this week have been a little crazy as I've had to work with several of Becca's care providers and suppliers in order to get things straight. (Yes, Becca has suppliers. And we had to switch some of them around due to insurance changes (not doctors, just her dealers). It reminded me of why I'm not working full-time these days! We also ended up in a feeding supplies crisis, as we still don't have the feeding bags that we needed on Monday, 'cause, hey, we don't REALLY need them every night, do we. (We do.) Super friend Mollie helped me out and saved us from having to wake up every couple of hours to bolus feed the tube-fed princess.
We did finally connect with the GI folks. I spoke with a nurse who was either consulting directly with Dr. Moulton or is at least smart enough to say that she was. :) After a good bit of trouble finding a pharmacy that would work with use (see above), we have now started Becca on the compounded generic formulation of Prilosec. (Compounding just means that they take the solid medicine and make it into a liquid. Only certain pharmacies do it and only certain compounding pharmacies file insurance claims for those meds and only certain methods of compounding are covered by TennCare. These are things I learned this weekend.) We were able to dissolve the Prevacid solutabs in water and give them to Becca because the little balls of medicine (like the ones that are in the adult capsules) are designed not to dissolve. We couldn't crush it up and put it in applesauce or any other food that consistency because she doesn't eat those foods. She has taken a few bites of applesauce in her life, so we did try that and she gagged on it and puked...which made for a negative association with applesauce in general. Awesome. Besides, the Prevacid didn't seem to be working anyway, since even when we could it get in her, she still usually threw up another time during the day. The liquid Prilosec apparently tastes really gross (to Becca), so we shoot it directly into her button. It's kind of a funny process - we measure her 5 ml's in a small syringe, squirt it into a big syringe, add an adapter that fits into her button (which the small one doesn't have), and squirt it in. But hey, she's not gagging on it and throwing up! Actually, she is still throwing up, but not from the medicine, and it's only been a couple of days on it. I'll keep you posted!
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Wednesday Weigh-In
Back to the original title! Hooray for me! Here's the scoop:
Last week: 9.8 kg (21 pounds, 10 ounces), 33 inches
This week: 9.9 kg (21 pounds, 13 ounces), 33 inches
Week's change: +100 grams (3 ounces), + 0 inches
Net change: +2200 grams (70 ounces = 4 pounds, 6 ounces), +4 inches
Still haven't heard back from GI.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Weigh In and GI Update
January 26: 9.6 kg (21 pounds, 2 ounces), 33 inches
February 16: 9.8 kg (21 pounds, 10 ounces), 33 inches
Three weeks' change: +200 grams (8 ounces), + 0 inches
Net change: +2100 grams (67 ounces = 4 pounds, 3 ounces), +4 inches
So we're still moving along...a slower pace, but still gaining, which is better than we did last fall. For the next couple of weeks, she will be likely to have gained about her coming home weight (from the NICU at 5 1/2 weeks past her due date) since we got the feeding tube in July. I don't remember exactly how much she weighed when we brought her home, but it was somewhere around 4 1/2 pounds.
Two weeks ago, we had an appointment with the GI doc. I'm not sure if I mentioned it on here or not, but we changed her reflux med from Zantac to Prevacid about a month ago. We didn't go to the doctor then; it was all done over the phone and Vandy's messaging system. I spoke only to a nurse but ASSUMED that she was actually talking to the doctor, or at least that the doctor was at least aware enough of the situation since he was the one (again, I assumed) was writing the prescription.
Silly me. When he asked how everything was and I launched into how the new med wasn't really helping (b/c she was still vomiting), he stopped me as he looked back over her chart again...because he didn't even know that we had switched meds. When I mentioned it, he thought our regular pediatrician had done it because HE DIDN'T WRITE THE PRESCRIPTION. He had no idea that I had even had a minor battle with the nurses to get anything changed. What. The. F. Since then, I've pulled up the electronic copy of the prescription (via the aforementioned messaging system, which is really handy), and it was NOT written by a doctor. I can't tell if the prescriber was a nurse practitioner or a just another nurse b/c it's written in some secret code (something like "written by XXXX in accordance with policy #78431598713.1").
Let me be clear. I love nurses. I love nurse practitioners. I have nothing against them, and would have no problem seeing one myself (with the exception of OB care since I'm in the major leagues there). I would be happy to send my sweet husband to an NP. The NICU NP's saved Becca's life on a regular basis. I'm a fan.
BUT - I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that if a child has specialists from NINE (9) different departments, maybe, just maybe, that patient needs to be treated by the full medical doctor who knows her and her history. Call me crazy. I'm quite sure whoever I was speaking with did not take the time to read Becca's entire medical history or her chart. I know how long it takes STAR panel (the medical charting software they use) to load her chart because I often have to make awkward small talk with the providers while they wait. So maybe, just maybe, when I send a message to the doctor about a significant part of my daughter's medical care and well-being, that doctor should at least lay eyes on the message, consult with the nurse, etc, even if he is too busy to actually take the time to call me himself (which, mind you, several of our doctors do). But our doc did not even KNOW that we were having issues.
You can guess how blunt I'm going to be in the message I'm sending them tonight. "PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT DR. MOULTEN SEES THIS MESSAGES PERSONALLY AND RESPONDS TO ME DIRECTLY." At least I'll say "please," right?
Wow, I'm more upset about this encounter than I had realized. Thanks for you patience with my blog therapy. :)
Still, even with the less-than-stellar communication and complete lack of teamwork, the medicine switch hasn't been a horrible thing. But it's still not working. This week, Becca has thrown up 4 times. That's maybe an improvement, but it's still way too much. Yes, she's still gaining weight, which is the first difficulty with the vomiting (the sheer loss of calories), but she is still vomiting a lot. And I think it's starting to have a psychological effect on her. I think I've told you that she makes Baby Rosie throw up occasionally, and the other day she told me that Elmo was crying because he was sad because he had thrown up, and then she had to carry him around and comfort him for several minutes or "he" would start crying again. As if there is already enough going on in her life to give her an eating disorder. That's just pitiful.
So here's what we did: the nurse had started us on 7.5 mg of Prevacid twice a day, and Dr. Moulten upped it to 15 mg twice a day. Prevacid is a stronger medicine than Zantac, and the doctor (unlike the nurse - I specifically asked her) was able to explain how it might actually help reduce the vomiting. Zantac basically just reduces the pH in your stomach so you don't have as much acid floating around. Prevacid (and Prilosec as well, I believe) actually shut off the acid-producing pump in your stomach by blocking the receptors that tell it when there is food in the stomach, starting it up. It still produces some acid, but not nearly as much. And less acid in the stomach makes for a healthier esophageal sphincter. (That's the muscle band at the top of the stomach that opens and closes to let food in - and vomit out). If the sphincter is inflamed (which Becca's is), it is looser, so it's easier for things to pop back up. That's why she is way more likely to vomit when she gets choked up on something - once the reflex is triggered, there's really not much to stop the contents of her stomach from making their reappearance (much like my innards when I was pregnant). I'm also guessing that the fact that she had a tube running through the sphincter and into her stomach for 18 weeks of her life, including 5 of them when she was a past-term infant, hasn't exactly helped to strengthen its muscles. We don't actually see much textbook reflux (or at least we didn't in her tests), but when she gags (which happens frequently, given her sensory and feeding issues), you better get out of the way (unless you are SuperMom or SuperDad, who run TO the puke, which is what makes us Super).
So - the Prevacid should help get the sphincter healthier and keep food down. But like I said, she's still puking. And here's the ironic part - 3 of the past 4 vomits have been triggered by her choking on her Prevacid quick-dissolve tablet. I know that either Prevacid or Prilosec is availing in a liquid form because I have friends whose infants have taken it, but apparently TennCare won't pay to have medicines compounded into liquids anymore, so we may be stuck with the puke pill that is supposed to stop the puking. Awesome.
I think the next step is for me to send a polite-yet-firm message to the office requesting to speak with Dr. Moulten himself. I think (because he told me this would possibly happen) that he's going to add the Zantac back in and see if together they can settle her little tummy down.
And then we've got to get back into feeding therapy. Yes, we took a little (3 week) hiatus. Long story short, we are switching therapists, not because of any particular issues but because of insurance changes, etc. Once we get all the paperwork in, Becca will start getting feeding therapy AT school, which is awesome because it means that they can actually do part of the session in the classroom during snack or lunch, so she'll have her peers around to help encourage her. (And it's also awesome because it's done during school hours so we don't have to take an entire morning to trek 80 miles round-trip to Vandy every Friday - woot!) Both of her former feeding therapists have been happy with her actual chewing, but I think there are some issues there. There's the gagging, but we're also noticing (because we get to see her meals multiple times) that she's swallowing a lot of things whole. She threw up in the bath tonight (got choked on some water) and started playing with the mini pepperonis. Niiiice.
I'll keep you posted. If I had known GI issues were going to be so much trouble, maybe we wouldn't have added them to the cadre of doctors this summer. Ha - if only it worked that way, right? :)
p.s. John took down the crib tonight. We had left it up in her room in case the switch to the big girl bed didn't go so well. She never needed it - and now there's no going back!
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Weekly Weigh-In: The You're-REALLY-Not-Going-to-Believe-This Edition
Last week: 9.3 kg (20 pounds, 9 ounces), 31.5 inches
This week: 9.6 kg (21 pounds, 2 ounces), 33 inches
Weeks change: +300 grams (9 ounces), + 1.5 inches
Net change: +1900 grams (59 ounces = 3 pounds, 11 ounces), +4 inches
I knew this was going to be a big week. But I didn't think it was going to be this big again! Even though Becca threw up 3 (or maybe 4?) times, she has been looking v.e.r.y chubby. So chubby in the cheeks, in fact, that the possibility of mumps crossed my (hyper-vigilant) mind more than once. In lighter moments this week, though, I taught her to play the old youth group favorite "Chubby Bunny". (She's been "packing" a lot this week - filling her cheeks with food like a chipmunk without actually eating any of it.) She's a champ. And again, I don't think she grew 1.5 inches in a week, but I think the past few weeks have been short. She's definitely been getting taller lately.
Dr. Rawls still isn't worried about the pace of the weight gain. (Because of her risk of metabolic issues, I'm a little nervous when she puts on so much weight at once.) He is quite proud of her, though, and made a point to show her off to a resident who was in clinic today. Sure, he's impressed with her medical history/recovery/story, but he is mostly impressed with her awesome monkey impression. The girl's got skillz.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Wednesday Weigh-In: The You're-Not-Going-To-Believe-This Edition
Last week: 9.0 kg (19 pounds, 14 ounces), 31 inches
This week: 9.3 kg (20 pounds, 9 ounces), 31.5 inches
Weeks change: +300 grams (11 ounces), + 0.5 inches
Net change: +1600 grams (50 ounces), +2.5 inches
Yeah, WHAT THE CRAP? Up 11 ounces in one week? We weighed her twice to make sure - and got consistent results. Same scale as every week. Stripped down totally naked, like always. And she gained 85% of her birthweight in one week. Wowzers!
Dr. Rawls thinks that part of the massive gain is due to the fact that she had been sick (perpetual cold), but has been feeling better this week. You naturally drop weight when you are ill, but you pick that weight back up pretty quickly.
I, on the other hand, chalk it up to the Olive Garden!
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Wednesday Weigh-In
Last week: 8.95 kg (19 pounds, 12 ounces), 31.5 inches
This week: 9.0 (19 pounds, 14 ounces), 31 inches (Seriously, I might just stop posting the length, though it's handy to keep track of it in the long run. This was measured by the same woman and on the same table as last week and two weeks before that. In the past 3 weeks, she's "lost" a full inch and a half...and yet is taller than ever.)
Weeks change: +50 grams (2 ounces), - 0.5 inches
Net change: +1300 grams (39 ounces), +2 inches
Up a bit!
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Weekly Weigh-In
Sorry to start back with a lame weight check post, but it's Wednesday, after all! I'll try to get something with pictures up later. But here are this week's stats:
Two weeks ago: 9.0 kg (19 pounds, 13 ounces), 32.5 inches
This week: 8.95 kg (19 pounds, 12 ounces), 31.5 inches
Two weeks' change: -50 grams (1 ounce), - 1 inch
Net change: +1250 grams (37 ounces), +2.5 inches
And that puts us right where we were on November 17th. No gain in 7 weeks. If only we could keep her from vomiting...I'm really starting to wonder if we should have done the nissen surgery that would prevent her from throwing up. The doctor didn't think it was necessary, but, like I've said before, he's never actually seen the massive pile of puke.
Becca got a baby doll from Santa, and today she made her baby throw up. Good pretend play, but I sure wish "doh dup" wasn't so embedded in her psyche.
(On the upside, though, Becca has just about kicked the cold she picked up travelling, and she actually signed and said "eat," walked over to her high chair and said, "Yeah, yeah," which roughly translates as, "Please do whatever it is that I am asking you to do, right now, please." (She's quite the combination of stubborn and polite, little stinker.) That's a good sign!)
Thursday, December 16, 2010
Weekly Weigh-In
Last week: 8.85 kg (19 pounds, 9 ounces), 32.5 inches
This week: 9.0 kg (19 pounds, 13 ounces), 32.5 inches
Week's change: +150 grams (4 ounces), +/-0 inches
Net change: +1300 grams (38 ounces), +3.5 inches
A surprisingly good week, considering she's got a cold, so she's throwing up during the day. (She throws up with any illness, stomach-related or not.) It may have to do with the fact that she hasn't pooped in 2 days!
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Weekly Weigh-In (Kind Of)
Well, apparently the "Weekly" part isn't even accurate these days!
Here's a recap of the past few weeks:
November 17 (regular Wednesday weigh-in): 8.95 kg (19 pounds, 12 ounces), 31 inches
November 24 (regular Wednesday weigh-in): 9.05 kg (20 POUNDS! Wohoo!), 31 inches
By the time we arrived at Grandma and Granddaddy's house for Thanksgiving that Wednesday night, Becca was running a little fever. It got worse over the next few days, peaking at 103.8 that weekend. By Saturday, I was on the phone with the pediatrician. From Saturday afternoon to Sunday evening, she was fever-free. Sunday night, the fever came back, and on Monday we went to see good ole Dr. Rawls. As always, they weighed her when checking her in:
November 29 (sick visit): 8.90 kg (19 pounds, 10 ounces) (We didn't do height.)
That meant that she was down 6 ounces in 5 days. Yuck. (Perhaps I should note here that when Becca gets any kind of illness, even if it's not stomach-related, she stops "tolerating her feeds," meaning that she throws up every night or morning...hence the loss of weight.)
The good doc determined that Becca had a "non-specific viral illness" that we just had to wait out. She wasn't feeling horrible, just tired, extra whiney and a little pitiful. I decided that when 2-year-olds get sick, their threshold for 2-year-old behaviors gets lowered. Anything could set off a tantrum, and heaven forbid if I didn't "Hold you!" all day long. I can't blame her, though. When I'm sick my threshold for 2-year-old behaviors drops, too. We watched a lot of t.v. but muddled through mostly in one piece.
On Wednesday, she was still running the fever (on day 8!), so we couldn't go to therapy, so we skipped the weigh-in as well. (It's usually done all in one trip.) Her fever finally broke for good on Thursday, and now she's still tiring quickly but doing fine. We never saw any respiratory symptoms, and the only GI symptom was directly related to the tube feeds (which we ended up slowing waaaaaaay down and mixing with Pedialyte to help with her toleration). She's back up to full feeds now, and we're back to our regular routine, which brings us to today's measurements:
December 8 (regular Wednesday weigh-in): 8.85 kg (19 pounds, 9 ounces), 32.5 inches;*
Which leaves us with a grand total of 100 grams (3 ounces) lost since November 17.
And that puts our net change, exactly 5 months from the day her g-tube was placed and about 4 months from the time we started growth hormone injections, at a weight gain of 1150 grams/35 ounces and a height gain of 3.5 inches.*
Even with the up and down months like this one, I feel like putting the tube in was a good decision. And the growth hormones are DEFINITELY a good decision (especially since she seems to be experiencing very few side effects from them and usually doesn't even mind the shot.) She's moving through clothing sizes now (currently in 12 months, but bumping up to some 18 months for the length), whereas she spent an entire year in 3-6 month clothes. That may not be the most scientific measurement, but from a mommy's point of view, that's a very good sign! Developmentally, she's picked up a lot of steam, too, and while it's impossible to pinpoint the tube feeds as the cause, having more consistent nutrition has definitely helped. If I had it to do all over again, I would probably push to have the g-tube placed when we were considering it in the NICU, but we had no way of knowing what the next 2 years would look like. Still, I'm glad we got it when we did - almost in the nick of time from some serious nutritional deficients. All's well that ends well, I guess.
*I highly doubt this height measurement is accurate.
Friday, November 19, 2010
Weekly Weigh-In
Last week: 8.9 kg (19 pounds, 10 ounces), 31 inches
This week: 8.95 (19 pounds, 12 ounces), 31 inches (though we had an endocrine appt. yesterday, and she had hit 9.0 kgs exactly, but I don't want to throw the weekly pacing off)
Week's change: +50 grams/2 ounces, +/- 0 inches
Net change (since July): +1250 grams/38 ounces, +2 inches
Slower than the past 2 weeks, but still gaining!
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Weekly Weigh-In
Last week: 8.75 kg (19 pounds, 4 ounces), 30.5 inches
This week: 8.9 kg (19 pounds, 10 ounces), 31 inches
Week's change: +150 grams/6 ounces, +0.5 inch
Net change (since July): +1200 grams/36 ounces, +2 inches
That's right; another 6-ounce gain (and back on our regular scale), meaning that she's gained very nearly her birthweight in 2 weeks! Still no puke at night and just a little puke at meals - I'm not changing a THING!
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Poop Doctor Follow-Up
We saw GI last week for another follow-up. Though he's one of my favorites, he's still the poop doctor. We didn't have to take in a sample this time, but Becca oh-so-graciously decided to break her 3-day poop strike while we were in his office. This was actually really handy because he decided he did want a sample after all. Thanks, Becca.
This visit replaced our normal weigh-in at the pediatrician's office, so she was on a different scale and measuring table...which is important to note when you look at these measurements.
Last weeks ago: 8.55 kg (18 pounds, 14 ounces), 31 inches
This week: 8.75 kg (19 pounds, 4 ounces), 30.5 inches
Week's change: +200 grams/6 ounces, -0.5 inch
Net change: +1050 grams/30 ounces, +1.5 inches
WOWZAS! Some of that weight gain can be attributed to the change in scales, but some of it has to be due to the fact that.....
....wait for it...
....BECCA DIDN'T THROW UP FOR A FULL WEEK!
So maybe the secret to her growth is not so much in adding calories everywhere possible (though I'm sure her Halloween candy did help), but in keeping what she eats in her stomach. Novel concept, I know. She did throw up during her snack yesterday afternoon (because she gagged on her apple), but she hasn't thrown up during her tube feedings in 9 days! We are, of course, ecstatic for many reasons, not the least of which is that we were d.o.n.e. with vomit. Every parent has to wake up in the middle of the night and clean up vomit occasionally, but every night, whether we were at home or travelling had gotten pretty old. I'm not so naive as to think that we've bid a final adieu to our vomity child, but it sure has been nice to have a break. Any maybe now the doctors and nutritionists will listen to me when I say stopping the vomit is a priority. (Heretofore, they generally have been wanting us to get every possible drop of formula in her.) After her stomach bug last week, we cut way back on her nightly feeds and are just now bumping back up her rate...I don't know, maybe they just can't imagine the amount of vomit we see in the night or in the mornings when she throws up....it's a lot of formula and calories down the drain (and in her hair, and all over her pajamas, and soaking her sheets, and covering her blankey, Lamby, bear, and pacis), so to speak. (We even stopped giving her regular baths at bedtime because we knew she'd just end up back in the bath in a few hours.)
Anyway, the doc was happy with her weight gain, so we're not changing much, but since we are dealing with a lot of vomit, he wanted the poop sample so that he could double-check some of the findings from her scope this summer. Apparently she had a small area of inflammation in her bowels that he didn't think much of at the time, but it could be a sign of some kind of infection that could be causing the upchucking. (Wow, haven't heard that word in a long time!) Also, if she keeps tossing her cookies (nice one...love the '90's!), he's going to change her reflux prescription from Zantac (or "minty fresh," as we've come to call it - Becca LOVES the "mint" (i.e. medicine) flavor!) to something stronger that not only neutralizes the acid in her stomach but reduces the overall amount of gastric juices.
For now, though, I'm just grateful for every night and morning that goes by without my baby covered in puke! :)
And just because I haven't posted pictures in a while, here's a little teaser from Halloween!
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Wednesday Weigh-In
Two weeks ago: 8.50 kg (18 pounds, 12 ounces), 30.5 inches
(We were out of town last week.)
This week: 8.55 kg (18 pounds, 14 ounces), 31 inches
Two weeks' change: +50 grams/2 ounces, +0.5 inch
Net change: +850 grams/30 ounces, +2 inches
Still not good in the weight department. Since the beginning of October, Becca hasn't gained any weight. (Two weeks ago she dropped weight, so this week's increase just bumps her back up.) She has, however gotten taller - 1.5 inches in 3 weeks, if you believe the measurements. (She's definitely taller, but I'm not sure I buy a 1/2 an inch a week...but who knows.) I'm grateful for the height increase, since we can't really make that up later like we can weight, but we really do need to see some more weight on her. Even when I am generous and use her adjusted age AND round her weight up, here's what the CDC BMI calculator tells me:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So, what do we do? Well, first off, we've got a prescription for a super-duper juice called Enlive. It's got some added protein and nutrients, but probably most importantly, it's got 250 calories per 8 ounce serving (unlike the usual 120-ish calories in regular juice). We are trying to get her to drink one juice box a day. This week's she's finished off one about every 1.5 days, so we're getting there. Becca loves juice, so I think this will be a really good way to supplement her oral feedings. We are also bolusing her 1-2 ounces of formula during the day if she doesn't eat at a meal. (Bolusing means that I give her a large amount in her button all at once instead of letting the pump give it to her over an extended period of time.) I'm still getting the hang of this, and she doesn't like it, which makes it difficult and messy. I have some hesitation with this technique because I want her to learn to satisfy her hunger by eating orally, but in the meantime, the kid's got to get some nutrition in her. We can't just bump up the volume on her night feeds because she tends to throw up in the morning when she's too full, and that really defeats the purpose!
She's not eating great (usually not even good), but I think the biggest issue is that she is burning so darn much energy! Really, I think she is busy even for a 2-year-old (and I've dealt with more than my share of 2-year-olds over the years), even though she can sit still and read books for 20 minutes or so. She is e.v.e.r.y.w.h.e.r.e and usually dancing, which means that she is stomping, spinning in a circle, waving her arms and squealing ALL AT THE SAME TIME. Hilarious. I'll try to get video for you. So, many of the calories that do make their way into her little body are expended through being a two-year-old...but that's what they are for, after all! And I'm not about to try to slow this kid down!
(On the positive side, though, I seem to be 10 pounds below my pre-Becca weight...not sure how that happened, but I'll take it!)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
